Can we reply the thread without labeling people, calling people fanatics and feminists?

My take on this is that gender distribution should reflect the setting of the story.

For instance, if the story is about wars then it's reasonable that man characters are much more than females. It is unreasonable to require 50-50 on genders under all circumstances.

Now in this game, I am not sure entirely what the story is based on, but it clearly isn't based on our modern society. So it's completely up to the devs to decide the gender distribution.

Supervised, I think calling Tygari a feminist isn't "labeling", it's factual. Like calling her a fanatic, because sadly she is (her unwillingess to accept opinions different from hers is one of the definitions of fanaticism...). I, on the other hand, have been called a troll, a mysoginist and even a nazi (she actually compared me to both Hitler and Stalin...). I think calling her a feminist and a fanatic is being overtly gentle, all things considered...

On the point you make, I am not exactly sure this game HAS a setting. While "classic" crusaders seem to suggest more of fantasy setting (with wizards, princesses and warriors), with event crusaders we also have a fair share of robots, a frat guy, a rockstar, an airplane pilot, a clown, a couple of superheroes... it looks really, REALLY random to me. Basically when the devs have an idea for an event they run with it, there is no such thing as a "setting"...

This game has no real story most of the characters are based off the BW1 and 2 games. Just because there arent = # of female crusaders doesnt mean that the dev are being racist/sexist etc. They crete cusaders that are interesting, THere are plenty of female crusaders sure therer could be more but in the long run it realy doesnt matter its just a game. Getting bent outa shape over something so meaningless is rather ridiculous.

Supervised is that because women were locked out or because they didn't wish to participate?
Most governments to this day, including America, have restrictions on what they will allow women to do in combat.

I like how the Israel's approach it. Men and women are fully equal and allowed to participate in any part of the military. Their only rule is a group has to be composed completely of a single gender due to problems of mixing male and female soldiers in a same unit.

Supervised your right, that was off topic. I don't know the pilot. As I said I been playing since February. I still believe the game is unfairly balanced. More female crusaders should be released.

Don't care if it a video game. More females should be released cause it not right. Whine all you want troll but I won't change my view.

"Don't care if it a video game. More females should be released cause it not right. Whine all you want troll but I won't change my view."

Translation:

"I don't care if I get worked up by meaningless things, if I think something is right then it MUST be right, because I can't be wrong. And I will never change my viewpoint because, again, I am never wrong".

And some people wonder why I called you a fanatic...

Lets either keep this civil ihatethisfing or teh dev will lock this up which it should this has gone down hill so badly that it should just be not reopened The point has been made already and trashing each other isnt solving anything. Please Poeple read the forum code of conduct or your posting priveldges could very well be revoked.

you are wrong, again. it was never just one topic and never just about me. it is all your posts collectively. by the way, "a very stupid topic" is further proving my point that you are nothing but a troll, as well as you pasting that link as it has you sarcastically saying (aka trolling) "Wow, those were 20 minutes of you life well spent...". it is also funny that you say you're disagreeing in that link when you have done nothing of the sort, you were only just being your dbag troll self.

So many ad hominems all of a sudden...

Read the arguments, post counter-arguments, attack arguments, defend arguments, improve arguments. Not necessarily in that order.

Accusing people of being trolls is not only bad for you to do, but bad for yourself because that is exactly what a troll wants you to. Only way to really counter a troll is with facts and reason without showing any sign of outrage about it. Other people that read the thread from start will see for themselves who is arguing their points or the topic and who doesn't. Trolling is only one of many interpretations of those that use logical fallacies and stay off-topic.

Teschio posts his arguments, points out flaws in other's arguments, and he defends his points. That is not trolling.

Also consider that people can be bad at discussions. Assuming that they have to be trolling, when they could simply struggle with wording etc., is a bad move. Bad arguments does not make people a troll.

Here's a tip: If you want to keep the thread and topic serious; NEVER be the first one to accuse people of trolling.