Log in to create a new thread
Codename Entertainment Forums > Legacy Games > Mystic Guardians > General Discussion > whirley vs wooter
| whirley vs wooter
| |
|
43 Posts
|
Link to post
- Posted April 13th 2012 at 7:54 AM
Naomi Shimunwhich is better,thank you for your responses :)
|
|
146 Posts
|
Link to post
- Posted April 13th 2012 at 9:42 AM
Mania Gowyou shouldnt compare them, they´re roles are completely different
one uses attack and the other uses elemental attack for usefulness whirly would be better but if you want a physical atacker then wooter is your choice |
|
741 Posts
|
Link to post
- Posted April 13th 2012 at 3:23 PM
Nate DauerWell, although one could argue the validity of a physically-powerful elemental Guardian like Zaat (as basically being an alternative to using a Normal type), with an element like Wind you really got finish things ASAP because *everybody* has a type advantage over you with their normal-type attacks. That said, I wouldn't make a Wind type a part of my party unless I was using him specifically because I needed a Wind-type attacker using Wind-type attacks.
|
|
242 Posts
|
Link to post
- Posted April 14th 2012 at 11:12 AM
Jonathan YapLast Edited April 14th 2012 at 11:12 AM Wooter>Whirly.
Simple as that. Whirly is extremely tougher to beat though, therefor, I would select him if i had to make a decision. Wooter vs. Whirly, wooter would win;most likely. |
|
26 Posts
|
Link to post
- Posted April 16th 2012 at 12:59 AM
Josh Swensoni liked wooter so i caught it.
really good for physical attacker which was said. |
|
Log in to reply to this thread! | |